Collaborative Open-science and meta REsearch
Quick jump to sections: Who are we? / Team overview / Project summary / Get involved: Join us / Publications & preprints / Our team / Completed replications / Planned replications
Project pages:
- Team’s Google Scholar page (updated twice a year, last update: December 2022)
- Open Science Framework (materials, datasets, and code)
- ResearchGate (preprint/publication updates)
- Resources developed
Who are we
We are a team of over 70 early-career researchers from around the world and over 400 students from Hong Kong aiming to practice and promote best-practices open-science and meta research. The team is coordinated by Gilad Feldman and based on his work with undergraduate students in his courses and guided thesis work with undergraduates and taught masters students (MSc).
Our main activities in the years 2018-2023 have been focused on: 1) Mass-scale project completing over 120 replications and extensions of classic findings in social psychology and judgement and decision making, 2) Building collaborative resources (tools, templates, and guides) to assist others in implementing open-science.
A 5 minutes introduction to the team:
A 20 minutes introduction to the team (Big Science Conference 2022):
A 45 minutes presentation (Exeter ReproducibiliTea, 2023) that also includes our shift towards Registered Reports and committing to submitting and supporting Peer Community in Registered Reports initiative (since 2021):
Team overview presentations
A 3-hours workshop summarizing our 3 years of running the project and 100 replications milestone (January 2021):
[A shorter 45 minutes version (ReproducibiliTea Oxford December 2020)]
Project summary
WARNING: Preliminary summarized findings, still need to be verified and peer-reviewed. Only the publications are verified.
Summary: (last update: January 2021):
mass pre registered replication project status update portrait posterDownload the poster: PDF / PNG
Get involved: Join us
Are you an open-science early-career researcher and want to join?
Please see our detailed guide on how to join this project.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me and consider joining our mailing list.
Publications & Preprints
Our team
A great team of open-science JDM Early Career Researcher collaborators joined us to finalize students’ reports for journal submissions:
Completed replications
WARNING: Preliminary student summarized findings, need to be rechecked and verified. Only publications are verified.
Note: Those completed replication projects in the table marked as “open” in grey are still available for you to join us and take lead.
Planned replications
Note: Those in the table marked as “RRS1 done, need lead” are completed Registered Report Stage 1 manuscripts, completed with simulated datasets and planned data analysis code, with ready manuscripts based on our templates, looking for leads ECRs to help us submit those to journals as Stage 1 and carry these all the way through an in-principle acceptance till a successful Stage 2 publication.
Still available for guided thesis students (Zotero collections): High priority, regular priority
(if you install Zotero you can easily import and browse those)
How to cite this project?
Please cite as the following:
CORE Team (2023). Collaborative Open-science and meta REsearch. DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/5Z4A8. Retrieved from http://osf.io/5z4a8 and https://mgto.org/core-team/
Projects that have used CORE team outputs
(will try and keep track of interesting projects I see that used our mass replications in some way)
- Reanalyses of 40 of our published replications to predict replication outcomes based on target article’s language patterns:
Youyou, W., Yang, Y., & Uzzi, B. (2023). A discipline-wide investigation of the replicability of Psychology papers over the past two decades. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(6), e2208863120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2208863120 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2208863120 - Brazilian team that took our replication, translated to Portugeuse and ran on Brazilian samples with almost 1 to 1 replication of our replication results:
Borborema, R. S., de Moraes Ferreira, M., da Silva, A. L. M., Bastos, R. V. S., Fatori, D., Feldman, G., Seda, L., & Batistuzzo, M. C. Inaction Inertia Effect: Foregoing Opportunities as a Consequence of an Initial Failure to Act – a Replication-Extension Study in the Brazilian Population.
[Preprint] [Open materials/data/code]